Calling Card Fraud Information

For additional calling card fraud information, please check out some of the links and resources below.

From the Federal Trade Commission

The FTC is the chief enforcer against calling card abuse and fraud in the United States. In addition to the links cited below, you can also search the FTC site to find many additional articles and reports about FTC calling card actions.

  • FTC Testifies on Prepaid Phone Card Fraud - Excerpt: "The Federal Trade Commission today told the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation that while the FTC will continue its aggressive law enforcement and consumer education programs in the prepaid calling card arena, pending legislation would benefit consumers by providing “an additional remedy to those already available to the Commission.”
  • Buying Time: The Facts About Pre-Paid Phone Cards - Excerpt: "...the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the nation’s consumer protection agency, says that some pre-paid phone cards can have hidden costs. As a result, they don’t deliver the number of calling minutes they advertise. Because you pay in advance, you may be out of pocket — and out of luck — if you discover a problem trying to use the card. That’s a big difference between pre-paid phone cards and traditional long distance calling cards, where charges don’t appear on your bill until after you’ve made the call."
  • Companies Agree to Pay $2.25 Million as Part of FTC Crackdown on Fraud in the Prepaid Calling Card Industry - Excerpt: "In its lawsuit, the FTC charged that the companies misled consumers about the number of minutes of talk time their prepaid calling cards provided. The FTC’s testing showed that consumers received only about half the advertised minutes. In addition, the FTC alleged that the defendants’ cards carried hidden fees. For example, while the defendants’ ads for their cards often prominently claimed “no connection fees;” they then failed to clearly disclose a host of random fees, such as “hang-up” and “maintenance” fees and “destination surcharges” that could wipe out the value of the cards. Such fees were, at best, “disclosed” in tiny font in confusing terms that were incomprehensible in any language. At the request of the FTC, shortly after the case was filed, the court issued an order temporarily halting these deceptive practices and appointed a monitor to ensure the defendants’ compliance with the law."

Comments

0 comments

Comments are welcome. Off-topic or promotional comments will be deleted.

Post new comment

We will not share or publish your email.

Back to top